MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391854997 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3365938

Design and Performance Measurement of Worn-on-Body Instrumental Ultra-Miniaturized UWB Wearable Patch for e-Health Monitoring

2024· article· en· W4391854997 on OpenAlexaff
Sumon Modak, Vikrant Kaim, Taimoor Khan, Binod Kumar Kanaujia, Ladislau Matekovits, Karumudi Rambabu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersScience and Engineering Research Board
KeywordsGround planeCoplanar waveguideUltra-widebandMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaAcousticsAntenna (radio)Antenna measurementComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsMicrowave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A conformal, ultra-miniaturized, circuit integrated ultra-wideband (UWB) coplanar-waveguide (CPW) antenna system for worn-on-body applications is developed in this article. The performance study of the proposed antenna is performed over a four-layer human body tissue model. A shortened ground plane and a pair of L-shaped stubs are included to the umbrella-shaped patch configuration to enhance the impedance bandwidth between 3.15-10.55 GHz, which encompass a variety of applications like WiMAX band (3.3-3.8 GHz), WLAN band (5.150-5.350 GHz), unlicensed ISM band (5.725-5.875 GHz), and X-band (7.250-7.745, and 7.900-8.395 GHz). The realization of wideband behavior for the reported antenna is studied using the characteristic mode theory (CMT). A maximum peak gain of 4.2 dBi is achieved with maximum radiations in broadside with higher front-to-back ratio in both E-plane and H-plane. Furthermore, the robustness of the proposed antenna is evaluated by studying its performances under different conditions, such as using a coaxial feeding system, bending and assessing SAR levels. The antenna is fabricated and assembled with various circuit components to validate its performance with the simulated counterpart. The experiment is carried out by placing the antenna structure over different parts of the human body. Finally, a comparative analysis is carried out and it is found that the proposed antenna exhibits 98.2% compactness than the existing antenna designs available in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207