Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the winter of 1954, we went on a skating trip north of Amsterdam with a group of friends, all of whom were, like us, in their mid-twenties.Between the village of Jisp and the town of Purmerend, Corrie and I singled each other out from among the group.We skated the last stretch against the wind in the traditional Dutch way, I with my hands behind my back, Corrie holding on to me.Although we belonged to the same circle of students and had many friends in common, we had only met briefly once or twice, and did not know each other before this trip.Corrie was in her final years of an English degree, similar to a Canadian m.a.I, having completed an equivalent program in French and Russian, had become a travelling salesman in languages.I taught French part-time at the University of Utrecht, Russian at the University of Groningen once a week, and French at the Montessori Lyceum in The Hague.Yet Amsterdam remained the centre of my universe, and when we married in the spring of 1955 we settled there without considering other options.It was ten years after the end of World War ii, and the general mood was optimistic in spite of the Cold War.Reconstruction of our devastated country was well underway.Moderate socialism had reduced pre-war inequalities, and concerns about the depletion of raw materials and the extinction of many species of plants and animals had not yet spread.The first years of our marriage were in harmony with the times.We knew that life had not been easy for either of us, but we hardly talked about our experiences during the war years.We looked forward to a future with children.I was even, albeit reluctantly, starting work on a doctoral thesis, and there was no time for dwelling on the past.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".