MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391873222 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.161

A161 IMPACT OF EARLY-ONSET COLORECTAL CANCER ON DISABILITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS IN CANADA: 1990 TO 2019

2024· article· en· W4391873222 on OpenAlexaffabout
Igor Stukalin, Meena Gupta, Katherine A Buhler, Christopher Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorectal cancerMedicineGerontologyDemographyCancerOncologyInternal medicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy and remains a leading cause of potentially preventable morbidity and mortality. Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is a growing public health focus, particularly in North America, where incidence rates have increased over time. Aims Recognizing that EOCRC affects patients in the prime of their life, we aimed to estimate the impact of EO-CRC on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost in Canada between 1990 and 2019. Methods We used the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) Study to assess temporal trends in incidence, mortality and DALYs for EOCRC (patients ampersand:003C50 years old) in Canada between 1990 and 2019. Point estimates are available from http://ghdx.healthdata. org/gbd-results-tool. Rates were estimated per 100 0000 individuals at risk and stratified by age and sex. Annual percentage changes (APC) were estimated using joinpoint regression with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results In 2019, the incidence, mortality and corresponding DALYs rates for EOCRC were 15.67 (95% CI 11.58, 20.81), 3.19 (95% CI 2.81, 3.61), and 161.88 (95% CI 142.50, 183.53) per 100,000 individuals, respectively. Overall incidence increased significantly during the study period by 1.12%/year (95% CI 0.91%, 1.62%). An analysis of the temporal trends demonstrates that the most significant increase in incidence in EOCRC occurred between 2000 - 2006 with an APC of 3.19% (95% CI 2.40%, 3.99%), which was primarily driven by an increased incidence in men. Mortality (APC 3.30%, 95% CI 2.41%, 4.19%) and DALYs (APC 3.28%, 95% CI 2.34%, 4.22%) for EOCRC also significantly increased for males between 2001 - 2006. Conclusions Our study reveals a substantial burden in early-onset colorectal cancer in Canada, with a significant increase in incidence over time and over 160 DALYs/100,000 population. Figure 1: Incidence (A), Mortality (B) and DALYs (C) for EOCRC in Canada between 1990 and 2019 with 95% CIs. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→