A154 PRIMARY APPENDICEAL GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR (GIST) IN A PATIENT WITH DELAYED APPENDICITIS: CASE PRESENTATION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon neoplasias, arising from mesenchymal tissue in the gastrointestinal tract. However, primary appendiceal GISTs (PA-GISTs) are rare, with less than 27 cases reported to date. Although treatable with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent resection, GISTs of the appendix can initially present with appendicitis-like symptoms, and are often treated as acute appendicitis (AA) due to initial misdiagnosis. A 75-year-old man presented to the emergency department of Brightshores Health System (BSHS) with right upper abdominal pain progressing to the right lower quadrant. He was referred to our surgical service, and his condition was treated as delayed appendicitis. Aims 1. To raise awareness of GIST as a distinct diagnostic possibility in patients presenting with acute appendicitis (AA)-like symptoms. 2. To assess whether delayed appendectomy has an impact in the overall disease outcome for PA-GIST. Methods A rare case of PA-GIST was found after a retrospective review of all appendectomies performed at BSHS for appendicitis with or without neoplasia in the last 11 years. To our surprise, we uncovered a rare case PA-GIST. Comprehensive chart review was performed. Results A 75-year-old man presenting with a 5-day history of right upper and lower abdominal pain was clinically diagnosed with AA. CT abdomen and ultrasound showed probable appendicitis with phlegmon, distal tip inflammation, no abcess and mild left hydronephrosis. After initial antibiotics and colonoscopy, the patient underwent interval appendectomy. Pathology revealed no AA, a low-grade GIST with focal interstitial cell of Cajal hyperplasia of the distal appendix and positive margin. Six weeks later, cecectomy showed no clinicopathologic evidence of residual PA-GIST. Literature review revealed 27 other PA-GIST tumors to date. Twenty three were found incidentally through imaging, colonoscopy, or surgery. Four cases involved patients presenting with AA symptoms. Our patient was among those presenting with AA symptoms, but with no histological evidence of appendicitis in the delayed appendectomy specimen. Consistent with 25/27 cases, our patient’s GIST displayed spindle morphology, ampersand:003C5cm in size, and without atypia, mitosis, or necrosis. Conclusions PA-GISTs tumors are rare, with only 28 cases reported to date, including ours. Some PA-GIST tumors are found incidentally in patients that present with symptoms of AA. Although there is no concensus opinion for optimal treatment of PA-GIST, delayed appendectomy followed by cecectomy have proven to be an acceptable treatment for our patient with no evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease after 6.5 years on follow up by clinical and endoscopic surveilance. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".