MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391873380 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.229

A229 DRUG PERSISTENCE WITH THERAPY OF ADALIMUMAB BIOSIMILAR, IDACIO, IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES

2024· article· en· W4391873380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Cheung, Ф М Кудаева, P Heidari, Don Truong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosimilarAdalimumabInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMedicinePersistence (discontinuity)DrugInflammatory bowel diseasePharmacologyImmunologyInternal medicineTumor necrosis factor alphaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background For post marketed medicine, drug persistence could be used as an indication for effectiveness and safety in routine clinical care over time. Non-adherence and non-persistence to treatment are associated with disease flares and may lead to disease progression among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in real-life. Aims The aim of this analysis was to explore drug persistence with an adalimumab biosimilar, Idacio, in IBD patients using the data collected by Fresenius Kabi patient support program (KabiCare) in Canada. Methods Patients with IBD enrolled in KabiCare and received at least one dose of adalimumab biosimilar, Idacio, were followed up from February 2021 to September 2023 in Canada. Medication initiation date and stop date, disease types (Crohn’s disease [CD], and ulcerative colitis [UC]) and patient treatment (categorized by naïve to biologic,or switched from other biologics) were recorded in the database. The stop date was the date when KabiCare was informed that medication was discontinued. The patients continuing medication were censored at the maximal follow-up date of analysis, September 12, 2022. Log-rank tests were used for KM (Kaplan-Meier) plot comparison to examine if there were differences in medication adherence between CD and UC, and between naïve group vs. switch group by disease. Results The study sample consisted of 1049 patients: 830 (79.1%) had CD, and 338 (32.2%) were in naïve group. KabiCare followed patients with CD for a median time of 512 days (interquartile range: 285-673 days; maximum: 895 days), and followed patients with UC for a median time of 492 days (interquartile range: 183-672 days; maximum: 925 days). At 800 days after starting the medicine, the drug persistence probability was similar for patients with CD and UC (At day-800: 76.6% vs. 67.6%, p=0.07). Among patients with CD, the drug persistence probability was higher in the switch group compared to naïve group (At day-800: 78.9% vs. 71.7%, p=0.0028). Among patients with UC, the drug persistence probably was similar in the switch group compared to naïve group (At day-800: 78.4% vs. 62.3%, p=0.34). Conclusions The drug persistence of adalimumab biosimilar, Idacio, was over 76% in patients with CD and over 67% in patients with UC 800 day after therapy initiation. Compared to patients in the naïve group, patients in the switch group were more likely to stay on adalimumab therapy. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsFrench-language works237,207