A189 INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF BACTERIAL HISTAMINE METABOLISM IN VISCERAL HYPERALGESIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Intestinal microbiota have been implicated in the expression of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) as patients present with altered gut microbial profiles and microbial metabolic activity. We have previously identified bacterial histamine to strongly influence mast cell accumulation through only IBS activation of the H4 receptor, leading to visceral hyperalgesia in a subset of patients with IBS. We hypothesize that a subset of IBS patients with high histamine-producing microbiota exhibit an aberrant histamine metabolism. Investigating the microbiota-driven pathways involved in histamine metabolism is key to understanding abdominal pain pathophysiology in IBS patients. Aims 1. To study whether variations of histamine levels are due to bacterial metabolism using in vitro and in vivo approaches. 2. To identify the prevalence of high histamine-producing and histamine-degrading bacteria in a clinical cohort via in silico analyses. Methods Using in vitro approaches, stool samples from healthy control (HC) donors and IBS patients were inoculated in minimal media in aerobic/anaerobic conditions, with/without excess histidine or added histamine. Bacterial histamine production and degradation were assessed in culture supernatants by ELISA. After identification through Sanger sequencing, individual colony capacity to degrade and produce histamine was assessed. Host and microbial contributions to histamine metabolism will be identified through analyses of germ-free mice colonized with IBS and HC stool samples. Results IBS patients (n=23) tested were found to consistently produce higher levels of histamine compared to HC (n=3). Among the tested isolated colonies from IBS patients (n=179) 61% produced histamine compared to 33% of HC (n=54), and 20% degraded histamine compared to 11% of HC. Of these colonies, 13% of only IBS isolates demonstrated the capacity to both degrade and produce histamine. Facultative anaerobes were found to possess both higher production and degradation capacity. Both pH and histamine concentration determine bacterial ability to produce or degrade histamine. Conclusions Based on these findings, both healthy and IBS individuals exhibit varying levels of histamine production/degradation, most prominently through facultative anaerobes. The intestinal environment and bacterial community composition are major regulators of bacterial histamine metabolism. The observed in vitro capacity to produce/degrade histamine, and its biological implications, will be confirmed with gnotobiotic humanized mice, ultimately aiding in designing microbiota-directed therapies for the management of visceral hypersensitivity. Funding Agencies CIHRFarncombe Innovation Fund
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".