A141 RISK OF TOTAL METACHRONOUS ADVANCED NEOPLASIA AFTER DETECTION OF PROXIMAL HYPERPLASTIC POLYPS, ADENOMAS, AND THEIR COMBINATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Recent research findings have identified an association between proximal sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and a greater risk of advanced metachronous neoplasia, without significant impact of distal SSL. Aims The principal aim of this study was to assess the risk of total metachronous advanced neoplasia (T-MAN) at the follow-up (fu) colonoscopy after detection of proximal hyperplastic polyps (HP), adenomas and their combination at the initial colonoscopy. Methods Medical records for patients aged 45 to 74 who underwent colonoscopies in both 2014 and 2015 were reviewed. The primary outcome was the presence of T-MAN (comprising advanced adenomas or high-risk SL) during the follow-up colonoscopy depending on the presence of proximal HP, adenoma, or their combination at index colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included assessing the risk of T-MAN at follow-up depending on index findings characteristics. Results 2014 patients were screened and 764 were included in the final analysis (44.1% male vs 55.9% female; mean age, 63y; median follow-up, 3.46 years). Patients with both proximal hyperplastic polyps and colonic adenomas during their initial colonoscopy had a significantly higher risk of developing T-MAN than patients with a combination of adenomas and distal HP or with only adenomas at index colonoscopy (30.5% vs 19%) [Hazard-ratio (HR)=1.95 (95% confidence interval (CI)1.3-2.9)]. A combination of proximal hyperplastic polyps and colonic adenomas is associated with a higher risk of T-MAN during follow-up than proximal HP alone (30.5% vs 13.9%) [HR=3.4 (95% CI 1.3-8.7)]. No statistically significant evidence was found to identify an increased risk of developing T-MAN at follow-up in patients presenting adenomas alone vs those with only proximal HP (19.1% vs 13.9%) [HR=1.9 (95% CI 0.75-4.7)]. Conclusions Patients with proximal hyperplastic polyps have an increased risk of presenting a T-MAN at the follow-up colonoscopy. Presenting a combination of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas indicates a higher risk of developing T-MAN than presenting an HP or adenoma alone. Funding Agencies Daniel von Renteln is supported by a "Fonds de Recherche du Québec Santé" career development award. He has also received research funding from ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Ventage, Pendopharm, Fujifilm and Pentax, and has received consultant or speaker fees from Boston Scientific Inc., ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, and Pendopharm. Roupen Djinbachian is supported by a “Fonds de Recherche du Québec Santé/Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux” clinical research award. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".