A214 AGE, SEX AND POSITION INFLUENCE UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function may be evaluated using high resolution manometry (HRM) to measure manometric parameters specific to the UES. The UES parameters are not well established however there is evidence suggesting a relationship between the UES parameters and esophageal motility disorders as well as UES parameters and symptoms including dysphagia, globus sensation and reflux. The Esophageal Symptom Questionnaire (ESQ-30) is a validated tool in the assessment of esophageal symptoms and measures the frequency and severity of dysphagia, reflux and globus through three separate sub-scales (ESQ-D, ESQ-R, ESQ-G respectively). Aims We aimed to identify the relationship between UES manometric variables and patient demographic variables (age, sex) as well as patient symptoms including broad categories of globus sensation, dysphagia and reflux. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive reports from HRM studies performed between October 2021 – March 2023 who provided consent for inclusion in the motility databank and completed ESQ-30 questionnaires. All values expressed as median (IQR: 25-75-centile). Values were compared with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Relationships between manometric diagnosis, UES pressures and symptomatology were explored. Results 681 patients underwent esophageal manometry and completed the ESQ-30 questionnaire. These patients were 442 (65%) female (mean age 54.6 +/- 14.8 years). Over the study period, 318 patients underwent esophageal HRM in the upright position and were diagnosed according to CCv3 and 361 patients underwent HRM in the supine position and were diagnosed by CCv4 manometric criteria. UES mean basal pressure was significantly higher in females than males (64.6 [42.3-89.1] vs 68.4 [48.4-96.1], p = .015) as well as in the supine position (77.5 [55.9-101.0] vs. 56.0 [38.7-80.3]. UES mean basal pressure was negatively correlated with age (R2 -.28 p ampersand:003C .001). In terms of esophageal symptomatology, dysphagia scores (ESQ-D) were negatively correlated with UES mean basal pressure (R2 -.15, p ampersand:003C .001). Conclusions Age, sex and position may influence UES manometric pressures. The finding of higher UES pressures in the supine position may reflect a mechanism for decreasing proximal reflux. The decreased UES basal pressure with age is possibly related to changes in the integrity of the neuromuscular system. Having a better understanding of the poorly understood normal UES dynamics and how this changes in motility disorders may allow us to more specifically target areas for treatment. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".