A114 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PARACENTESIS PRACTICES IN PEOPLE WITH ADVANCED CIRRHOSIS IN AN AMBULATORY CARE SETTING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a lethal complication of decompensated cirrhosis carrying a 90% mortality rate when left untreated. Despite AASLD recommendations, there is a practice gap regarding fluid cell count (FCC) collection during paracentesis. Aims We initiated prospective quality improvement (QI) project to improve FCC collection in an ambulatory care setting from a baseline of 78% to a goal of 100% compliance between September 11, 2022 and April 17, 2023. Methods We examined the effects of a quality improvement initiative in 233 adult patient encounters with cirrhosis undergoing paracentesis in an ambulatory setting located within a quaternary care centre in Toronto, Canada within the study timeframe. Using a multidisciplinary approach, the quality improvement initiatives included focused groups, education regarding AASLD guidelines, development of a paracentesis bundle, and streamlining workflow process. Descriptive statistics were collected. Statistical analysis using run charts and p-charts were conducted using QI Macros. Approval was obtained from the QI Review Committee at the institution where this QI initiative took place. Results Baseline adherence for collecting ascitic FCC per paracentesis procedure was 78%. Inconsistencies during process mapping such as variations in documentation, printing FCC labels and consistency in FCC collection were identified as root causes. Thus, bedside paracentesis bundles were introduced to standardize process and improve workflow. Post-intervention, the FCC rate increased marginally to 79.6% with no special cause variation identified (Figure 1). Subgroup analysis demonstrated FCC collection rates of 100% amongst registered nurse (RN) and nurse practitioners (NP), 97% amongst resident physicians, and 92% amongst attending physicians. Subsequently, another subgroup analysis was completed demonstrating 97% FCC collection rate amongst general hepatology group, while 40% FCC rate amongst specialty hepatology group. Overall rate of SBP was 1.62% (N=3). Conclusions This prospective QI study revealed a gap in guidance pertaining to the role of ascitic fluid cell count collection in patients with cirrhosis undergoing paracentesis in ambulatory settings. Further studies ascertaining rationale for not sending FCC may be helpful in elucidating why there is a gap in clinical practice. Additionally conducting studies in ambulatory settings to assess FCC collection's impact on morbidity and mortality will provide vital evidence and clarity for the role of FCC in this vulnerable patient group. Figure 1: P-chart demonstrating percentage FCC Collection per week from September 11, 2022 to April 17, 2023. UCL indicates upper control limit; CL, center line; LCL, lower Control Limit. Funding Agencies Toronto Centre for Liver Disease funded the MSc QI program for Mary Sedarous (writer) who completed this study as her MSc QI project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".