MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391873608 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.233

A233 PHENOTYPE OF MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIFESTATIONS IN A CANADIAN INCEPTION COHORT OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2024· article· en· W4391873608 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emily Dzongowski, Nidhi Rashmikant Suthar, Thomas D. Walters, Anne M. Griffiths, Eric I. Benchimol, Jennifer deBruyn, Roberta Berard, Eileen Crowley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of ManitobaSickKids FoundationWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseCohortDiseaseClinical phenotypePhenotypePediatricsInternal medicineGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Musculoskeletal (MSK) manifestations, including arthritis and arthralgia, are among the most common extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), reported in 20-30% of adult patients [1]. However, there is a paucity of data regarding MSK EIMs in the pediatric IBD population. A recent systematic review [2] found only 13 studies with limited results, due to heterogenous study design and data reporting methods. As such, little is known regarding frequency of MSK EIMs, their phenotype, or factors associated with their development. Aims The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of MSK EIMs in a contemporary cohort of Canadian pIBD patients and describe the phenotype of MSK EIMs in this population. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study with data from the inception cohort of CIDsCaNN (Canadian Children IBD Network) comprising patients aged 2-17 from 12 Canadian pediatric centres, from 2014 to 2021. MSK EIM frequency was calculated for the cohort, and for subgroups by age, sex, and IBD type. MSK-EIM phenotype was described from case report forms with specific MSK features reported. Variables were compared with Pearson Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. For patients without MSK EIM at IBD diagnosis, a Cox regression survival analysis was used for time to MSK development, with right censoring for patients who never reported MSK EIMs. Results 1,330 pIBD patients were included, with 761 males (57.2%) and 569 females (42.8%). There were 824 CD (62.0%), 382 UC (28.7%), and 124 IBD-U patients (9.3%). 81 patients (6.1%) reported MSK EIMs, with 63 CD (7.6%), 10 UC (2.6%), and 8 IBD-U (6.4%). CD patients were more likely to have MSK EIMs (7.6% vs 3.6% UC/IBD-U, p=0.002). 47 patients (58.0%) had MSK EIMs at or before diagnosis while 34 had them ampersand:003E4 weeks after diagnosis. There was no difference in overall frequency between sex or age groups, or time to MSK EIM development by age or ethnicity. Females were more likely to develop MSK EIMs, with odds increasing by 4.68 for each year after diagnosis (p=0.047). 59 (74.7%) MSK patients were seen by a rheumatologist. Peripheral MSK disease was in 51 patients (63%), axial disease only in 37. Peripheral and axial MSK symptoms followed the course of bowel disease in 40.3% and 28.1% of patients respectively, which were not significantly different. Conclusions MSK EIMs affect 6.1% of a contemporary cohort of Canadian pIBD patients.This is less than reported in literature, likely due to physician-reported nature of our data. Our next step is to compare pIBD patients with MSK EIMs to a matched group without, for bowel disease-related outcomes and response to medications. Funding Agencies Cassie and Friends Care and Research Network (CREW) funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207