MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391873648 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.006

A6 LYSOPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE (LPC) AND LYSOPHOSPHATIDIC ACID (LPA) INDUCE VISCERAL HYPERSENSITIVITY IN IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME (IBS)

2024· article· en· W4391873648 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Pujo, Giada De Palma, Jun Lü, Gaston Rueda, Mikayla Hall-Bruce, Andrea Nardelli, Fernando Vicentini, Elena F. Verdú, S Vanner, Stephen M. Collins, Přemysl Berčík

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrritable bowel syndromeLysophosphatidylcholineLysophosphatidic acidInternal medicineMedicineGastroenterologyChemistryReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic abdominal pain is the key symptom in IBS. Gut microbiota produces a large variety of molecules that can regulate pain perception, including bioactive lipids. LPC and LPA are phospholipids, known to generate and maintain neurogenic pain in mammals, by directly activating multiple channels and G-protein coupled receptors on sensory neurons. LPC and LPA result from the conversion of phosphatidylcholine (PC), a major membrane-forming phospholipid in eucaryotes, as byproducts of inflammation. PC is also present in high concentration in eggs, meat and soybeans. It is unknown whether these two phospholipids play any role in chronic abdominal pain and whether they can be produced by the gut microbiota. Aims To investigate whether 1) LPC and LPA are increased in stool of IBS patients, and 2) whether microbiota from IBS patients can produce LPC and LPA and lead to visceral hypersensitivity. Methods Stool samples from 27 patients with IBS, collected both during periods of severe and minimal/no pain, were assessed for LPC and LPA levels by ELISA. Germ-free (GF) NIH Swiss and Swiss Webster mice (n=101) both sexes were colonized with fecal microbiota from IBS patients with either high or low fecal LPC and LPA levels, or microbiota from healthy controls. Mice were fed with control diet or diet enriched with PC diet (2g/kg of diet) for 5 weeks. Their visceral sensitivity was then assessed by measuring visceromotor responses to colorectal distension. The fecal samples were collected to measure the production of LPC and LPA Results The fecal concentrations of LPC and LPA were higher in IBS patients when experiencing severe abdominal pain, compared to periods of minimal or no pain. Mice colonized with fecal microbiota from IBS patients with high fecal LPC and/or LPA displayed visceral hypersensitivity compared to mice colonized with microbiota from healthy controls, or microbiota from patients with low fecal LPC and/or LPA levels. However, this increase in visceral sensitivity was only found in mice fed with diet enriched with PC. Furthermore, the increased pain responses to colorectal distension correlated with higher concentrations of fecal LPC and LPA. Conclusions Our data suggest that bacterial LPC and LPA is responsible for chronic abdominal pain in a subset of patients with IBS. Further studies are needed to identify the specific bacterial strains that produce these nociceptive phospholipids and precise mechanisms by which LPC and LPA induce visceral hypersensitivity. Funding Agencies CIHRThe W.Garfield Weston Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207