MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391873653 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.259

A259 METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION-ASSOCIATED STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE IS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTI-ORGAN COMORBIDITIES AND FIBROSIS PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD)

2024· article· en· W4391873653 on OpenAlexaff
Dana Kablawi, Shlomo Sasson, F Aljohani, Chiara Saroli Palumbo, Alain Bitton, Waqqas Afif, Péter L. Lakatos, Gary Wild, Talat Bessissow, Giada Sebastiani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseFibrosisGastroenterologyInternal medicineFatty liverOrgan dysfunctionSepsis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Patients with IBD are at risk for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) due to chronic inflammation, hepatotoxic drugs, alteration of gut microbiota. MASLD, formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, provides a positive rather than negative diagnosis, appropriately assigns a metabolic basis for hepatic steatosis (HS), avoids any potentially stigmatizing term, and excludes alcohol abuse. MASLD carries higher risk of both liver fibrosis progression and extra-hepatic involvement, including cardiovascular disease , extra-hepatic cancer, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data on the effect of MASLD on fibrosis progression and multi-organ co-morbidities are lacking in this population. Aims We aimed to determine if MASLD and liver fibrosis carry a higher risk of extra-hepatic co-morbidities in IBD. Methods We prospectively included consecutive IBD patients who underwent liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) by Fibroscan at a single centre. MASLD was defined as any grade HS without alcohol abuse and viral hepatitis. HS progression was defined as any grade HS (CAPampersand:003E270 dB/m), or transition to severe HS (CAPampersand:003E330 dB/m) with CAPampersand:003E270 but ampersand:003C330 dB/m at baseline. Fibrosis progression was defined as significant liver fibrosis (LSM≥8 kPa), or transition to cirrhosis (LSM≥13 kPa) with LSMampersand:003E8 but ampersand:003C13 kPa at baseline. We estimated incidence rates of HS and fibrosis progression by dividing participants with the outcome by number of person-years (PY) of follow-up. Covariate adjustments for HS progression were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression models and predictors of extra-hepatic conditions by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results 430 patients were included with mean age 43 years, BMI 25 Kg/m2, IBD duration 14 years, CRP 5.2, ALT 22; females 45%, ulcerative colitis (UC) 31.8%, T2DM 4.7%. Patients with MASLD had higher proportion of CV events (12% vs. 6%), CKD (8% vs. 3%) and hypothyroidism (12% vs. 6%) vs. those without. After adjusting for age, male sex and Crohn’s IBD subtype, MASLD remained an independent predictor of extra-hepatic comorbidities (aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.15–2.78; p=0.01) with T2DM (aOR 3.53, 95% CI 1.68-7.42; p=0.001). Patients were followed for 26 months (SD 16.4). Rate of HS progression was 16.2 per 100 PY (95% CI, 11.5-22.8) and liver fibrosis progression was 6.12 per 100 PY (95% CI 3.48-10.44). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for IBD duration and BMI,UC was associated with faster progression of HS (aHR 2.21, 95% CI 1.02-4.91). Conclusions MASLD is associated with extra-hepatic diseases in patients with IBD and can progress to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Figure 1. Evolution of NAFLD and associated liver fibrosis in patients with IBD. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→