MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391873670 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.273

A273 A PILOT PROSPECITVE, MULTI-CENTRE, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING FECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANTATION (FMT) TO PLACEBO AT INDUCING REMISSION IN MILD TO MODERATE CROHN'S DISEASE

2024· article· en· W4391873670 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Karen Wong, David Kao, Humberto Jijon, Neeraj Narula, Farhad Peerani, Christian Turbide, Karen I. Kroeker, Paul Moayyedi, Karen Madsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFecal bacteriotherapyCrohn's diseasePlaceboMedicineRandomized controlled trialTransplantationFecesInternal medicinePilot trialGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseasePathologyBiologyMicrobiologyAntibioticsClostridium difficile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background FMT has shown promise at inducing remission in ulcerative colitis. The effect of FMT on inducing remission in Crohn’s disease however remains unknown. Aims To evaluate the efficacy of FMT at inducing remission in mild-to-moderate Crohn’s disease Methods This double-blind, randomized, trial conducted at 3 Canadian academic centers (Edmonton, Hamilton and Calgary) randomized. Adult patients with mild-to-moderate Crohn’s disease with modified Harvey Bradshaw Index (mHBI) score of ampersand:003E5 and at least one objective measure of inflammation (CRP ≥ 8mg/L or fecal calprotectin (FCP) ≥ 250 ug/g) on stable dosing of concomitant therapy were assigned to FMT or placebo. First assigned treatment was by colonoscopy followed by 20 [DK1] capsules weekly for 7 weeks. Endoscopic severity (SES-CD) was assessed at baseline during colonoscopic delivery of assigned treatment and at week 8 by a blinded central reader using video recording. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in both clinical (mHBI ampersand:003C 5) and endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤ 5) at week 8. Responders (reduction of HBI ≥ 3 or HBI ≤ 5 and reduction of CRP or FCP by ≥ 10%) in FMT group were eligible to continue with open-label FMT capsule every 2 weeks. Non-responders in the placebo group were permitted to restart the trial at week 0 with open-label FMT. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes and safety outcomes. Results Between July 2017 to Jun 2021, 28 were randomized (16 to FMT and 12 to placebo). The study team voluntarily suspended the trial twice due to Health Canada safety warnings regarding potential transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms and SARS-CoV-2 through FMT. At week 8, 0% (0/16) of patients in the FMT group versus 8.3% (1/12) in the placebo group reached the primary endpoint of combined clinical and endoscopic remission. Of the 50% (8/16) in the FMT group who achieved a clinical response and continued on open-label FMT every 2 weeks, 12.5% (1/8) achieved the primary endpoint. Of the 7 non-responders in the placebo group who restarted the trial at week 0 and received open-label FMT, 28.6% (2/7) achieved primary endpoint at week 8 on open-label FMT. No death or hospitalization were observed. The study was terminated early at the recommendation of the Data Safety Monitoring Board. Conclusions FMT was not effective at inducing remission in Crohn’s disease using the FMT regimen in this study. However, this study was limited by a small sample size and recruitment barrier during the COVID pandemic. Future studies may consider other strategies to potentially enhance treatment response, including antibiotic pre-treatment, optimized donor-recipient pairing, and concomitant anti-inflammatory diet. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→