A276 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS AND INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. IBD and EoE have been linked to other autoimmune conditions. There has been conflicting evidence on whether these two diseases are associated. Aims The purpose of the current study is to perform a systematic review evaluating the incidence of co-existing IBD and EoE. To determine whether the relationship between IBD and EOE is unique for autoimmune conditions, we also evaluated the relationship between other autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and atopic dermatitis and EOE. Methods A comprehensive search strategy was conducted on July 10, 2023 using MESH terms for eosinophilic esophagitis and IBD, autoimmune disorders or connective tissue disorders in Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ovid); and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid). The primary outcome was defined as the frequency of concomitant IBD and EOE compared to the frequency of IBD alone. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of concomitant autoimmune conditions and EOE compared the frequency of the autoimmune condition alone, as well as the examination of clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic outcomes of patients with concomitant IBD and EOE compared to patients with IBD alone. Five independent reviewers participated in study selection applying eligibility criteria and selecting studies for inclusion. Duplicate items were removed and title and abstracts screening occurred. Any publication deemed potentially relevant by was carried forward to the full-text review. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Results Our systematic search identified 2144 potential studies. After screening titles, we were left with 268 studies. Following full text review, 50 studies remained which included 9 articles and 19 abstracts on IBD and EOE, and 8 articles and 14 abstracts on other autoimmune conditions and EOE. The 9 articles on IBD and EOE consisted of 6 retrospective cohort, 1 prospective cohort, 1 case-control and 1 case series study. 8 of the studies were conducted in the United States and 1 was conducted in Italy. There were 4 studies on adult populations, 4 studies on pediatric populations, and 1 study in both. There was a total of 133,451,249 patients evaluated, the majority being from one study (n=133,308,339 patients). The number of concomitant IBD and EOE patients per study ranged from 5 to 3506 patients and the number of IBD patients without EOE ranged from 33 to 701,601 patients. In the general population, the number of EOE patients alone per study ranged from 33 to 102,048. Completion of data extraction and statistical analysis is ongoing. Conclusions There may be an association between IBD and EOE. Further data analysis is ongoing. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".