MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391873710 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.061

A61 ELUCIDATING INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL INFLAMMASOME MECHANISMS THAT REPAIR THE MUCOSAL BARRIER DURING ENTERIC INFECTION

2024· article· en· W4391873710 on OpenAlexaff
Adrienne Ranger, Sagar M. Goyal, Stephen E. Girardin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammasomeEnteric feverMicrobiologyEnteric bacteriaIntestinal mucosaEnteric virusBiologyImmunologyMedicineInflammationInternal medicineEscherichia coliGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background To protect the gastrointestinal tract from infection, intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) lining the mucosa possess cytosolic complexes called inflammasomes which detect pathogenic insult and rapidly initiate inflammation to stop infectious spread. Active inflammasomes mediate crucial effector functions such as epithelial cell extrusion, pyroptotic cell death, and the release of interleukin (IL)-18 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Recent literature has shown that IL-18 and PGE2 mediate intestinal repair following epithelial damage from DSS-induced colitis. Exogenous administration of IL-18 in inflammasome deficient mice improves survival and reduces pathology. PGE2 activates intestinal cellular reprogramming to drive intestinal wound healing. Whether inflammasome derived IL-18 and PGE2 mediate epithelial repair during enteric infection is unclear. Aims Using murine small intestinal organoids (mSIOs), we will investigate how IL-18 and PGE2 production by intestinal inflammasomes directly impacts IECs at both transcriptional and physiological levels. We hypothesize that inflammasome derived IL-18 and PGE2 will act on the intestinal epithelium resulting in transcriptional reprogramming that promotes tissue regeneration and barrier reinforcement. Methods WT and Nlrc4-/- mSIOs were stimulated with flagellin or FlaTox to activate the NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome. The transcriptomic landscape was assessed with bulk-RNA sequencing and inflammasome activation was assessed by Western blot. IL-18 and PGE2 dependent gene targets were identified using Il-18-/- and indomethacin treated mSIOs by RT-qPCR. Results Bulk-RNA sequencing revealed an inflammasome activation dependent transcriptional signature in murine IECs upon NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome activation. GO term analysis showed these genes to be involved in actin cytoskeleton rearrangement, epidermal growth factor signaling, and regulation of cell-cell adhesion. The expression of PGE2 gene targets were significantly reduced by indomethacin treatment while IL-18 gene targets remained unaffected in Il-18-/- IECs. FlaTox induced the same transcriptional changes but substantially amplified their expression. FlaTox but not flagellin led to a significant drop in Lgr5 (stem cells) and Lyz1 (Paneth cell) expression and an increase in Ly6a, a marker of fetal-like stem cells. Conclusions This data demonstrates that inflammasome signaling causes transcriptional reprogramming of IECs that activates pathways involved in maintaining epithelial barrier integrity. While IL-18 had no effects on gene expression at 4 hours, PGE2 paracrine signaling contributed to the expression of wound healing genes. Stronger inflammasome mediated damage with FlaTox amplified the repair response at the transcript level and we observed transient reprogramming of IECs into a fetal-like state suggesting active tissue regeneration. Funding Agencies CCC, CIHREPIC: Emerging & Pandemic Infections Consortium

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207