A314 UNDIFFERENTIATED PANCREATIC CARCINOMA WITH OSTEOCLAST-LIKE GIANT CELLS: A CASE REPORT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (UCOGC) is a rare form of pancreatic cancer representing under 1% of cases. UCOGC is hypothesized to be a variant of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and while the pathophysiology is incompletely defined, it is felt to be an undifferentiated sarcomatoid carcinoma variant with chemotaxis of osteoclastic giant cells. Clinical, radiographic, or biochemical features do not reliably differentiate this from other tumors. Definitive diagnosis is made by histologic examination demonstrating non-neoplastic multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells (CD68 positive), mononuclear histiocytes, and neoplastic mononuclear cells. Aims To describe the case of a patient with UCOGC, highlighting key clinicopathologic features and management. Methods Case report and literature review. Results A 79-year-old man with atrial fibrillation on Xarelto presented with 4 months of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss (22 kg). An MRI revealed a dilated main pancreatic duct and side branches with abrupt cutoff in the neck due to an ill-defined lesion. Endoscopic ultrasound confirmed a 36 mm hypoechoic ill-defined mass in the pancreatic neck. Biopsy performed with a 22-gauge needle with dry suction showed tissue fragments consistent with UCOGC (Figure 1). Unfortunately, the patient presented to hospital with worsened abdominal pain and nausea and was found to have new portal, superior mesenteric, and splenic vein thrombosis. His anticoagulant was changed to Dalteparin. A multidisciplinary cancer conference was held including input from experts in Toronto, and due to surrounding inflammation and new thrombosis he was not considered a surgical candidate at the time and neoadjuvant treatment with standard adenocarcinoma chemotherapy was planned. Unfortunately, the patient continued to decline and he was treated with palliative intent FOLFIRINOX for 2 cycles before opting for a medical assistance in dying procedure. Conclusions Treatment for UCOGC has not been well studied due to its rarity. Surgery is first-line therapy if appropriate based on patient status and cancer stage. The efficacy of chemotherapy and radiation is unclear but as a suspected adenocarcinoma variant, standard chemotherapy regimens are often used. Research is ongoing with an area of interest being PD-L1 inhibition due to high tumor PD-L1 positivity rates. Recognition of this rare entity is crucial due to its distinct diagnostic and therapeutic characteristics with more research needed to establish optimal therapy. Figure 1: Pathologic examination with HPS and CD68 stains demonstrating UCOGC Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".