MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391878547 · doi:10.32920/25234624.v1

Multimodal Sensor Fusion Frameworks With Application to Human Action Recognition

2024· preprint· en· W4391878547 on OpenAlexaff
Zeeshan Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceModality (human–computer interaction)Convolutional neural networkSensor fusionComputer visionInertial measurement unitFuse (electrical)Wearable computerModalitiesField (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Human Action Recognition (HAR) is a progressive research area in the field of computer vision and machine learning. Earlier methods on HAR were based on single sensor modality, either vision-based sensor or wearable inertial sensor. Both of these modalities have some limitations that prevent widespread adoption of HAR; e.g. visual sensors typically require elaborate hardware setup and are limited to a small operating area, where inertial sensors are prone to drift. The solution is to fuse the information from different modalities. In this dissertation, we present novel multimodal sensor fusion frameworks that overcome the limitations of single sensor modality. In these frameworks, we convert all data streams to images through innovative signal to image conversion schemes and feed them to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), thus enabling extraction of higher-level features that CNNs are proven to be capable of especially from images. Moreover, we propose fast and robust multilevel fusion schemes by extracting features from multiple layers of the CNNs and employing statistical methods such as Canonical Correlation Analysis and gated fusion, instead of the more popular single stage fusion. We applied these fusion frameworks for HAR using depth and inertial sensors. At the input of each fusion framework, we transform depth and inertial sensor data into images called Sequential Front view Images (SFI) and Signal Images (SI). The SFI and SI images are then fused through our proposed multilevel frameworks for more accurate HAR while maintaining computational speed. We evaluate the proposed frameworks on three public multimodal HAR datasets, namely, UTD Multimodal Human Action Dataset (MHAD), Berkeley MHAD, and UTDMHAD Kinect V2 and achieved accuracies of 99.3%, 99.85% and 99.8% respectively.</p> <p>While the proposed frameworks were developed with HAR as a target application area, they can be applied to other fusion problems as well. We show the generalizability of frameworks by applying them to a different domain, where ECG (1D time series) data is converted to multimodal images and fed through our fusion frameworks for arrythmia classification and stress assessment. Preliminary results in these applications are encouraging, further strengthening the significance of the proposed frameworks.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207