MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391879963 · doi:10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.481

Assessment of Quality of Life in Patient with Knee Osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4391879963 on OpenAlexaff
Aneesa Jamil, Rabiya Noor, Fahad Raza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsKKT Orthopedic Spine Center
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisQuality (philosophy)Quality of life (healthcare)MedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAlternative medicineNursingPhilosophyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative musculoskeletal disorder that significantly impairs the quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals, primarily impacting their physical capabilities and emotional well-being. Understanding the factors contributing to the quality of life in knee OA patients is crucial for developing effective management strategies. Objective: This study aims to ascertain the quality of life in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis, emphasizing the role of demographic factors, physical limitations, and educational levels in influencing patient outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 100 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis, recruited from the Pakistan Society for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled (PSRD) over a four-month period. Participants were selected using a convenient sampling technique, with inclusion criteria set for individuals aged between 40 and 70 years who had a medical diagnosis of knee OA and were willing to sign the consent form. Data were collected through the AIMS-2 SF questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, focusing on demographic details, physical abilities and limitations, and overall quality of life scores. Results: The study population comprised 84% females and 16% males, with a significant portion having an intermediate level of education (35%). The quality of life scores indicated a poor to fair level of QoL among participants, with mean scores slightly below the borderline for being considered 'fair.' Physical limitations were significant, with 44% of participants experiencing difficulty in performing heavy physical activities daily and 36% facing challenges in walking or climbing stairs. Educational level emerged as a crucial factor, with lower educational attainment associated with poorer functional performance and quality of life. Conclusion: The findings highlight a predominantly poor to fair quality of life among knee OA patients, influenced significantly by gender, physical limitations, and educational levels. The study underscores the need for targeted interventions focusing on awareness, lifestyle modifications, and patient education to improve the quality of life in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health and Rehabilitation ResearchSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207