Apagamento editorial e manipulação epistemológica: um fetiche do capital mineral sobre o livro Noir Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considering that Sociology is the science of the social, whose object is diverse, alive, historical and in permanent movement, and that conflicts constitute a privileged locus for analyzing the social, since it is in them that contradictions appear most explicitly, this article discusses the legitimacy of a process of editorial erasure by withdrawing from circulation a book published and produced as a result of scientific research in Critical Theory. The book focuses on conflicts in African countries expropriated by Canadian mining projects. The analysis is based on the case of the 2008 book Noir Canada, translated into Spanish as Negro Canada in 2012, whose authors and publisher were sued by two large Canadian mining companies, which used epistemological manipulation of the social sciences as one of their strategies to disqualify the book and criminalize its authors through judicial and extrajudicial proceedings in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it