Extended state filter‐based velocity‐free finite‐time attitude control of spacecraft
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This brief presents a finite‐time output feedback control scheme for the velocity‐free attitude stabilization of rigid spacecraft under inertia uncertainties and disturbances. Note that either the finite‐time velocity observer or the finite‐time extended state observer contains the control torques, which makes the transient performance of the observer‐based output feedback control difficult to be regulated. Alternatively, the filter‐based output feedback control can overcome such problem naturally since the finite‐time velocity filter does not involve the control torques in its structure. Different from the existing finite‐time velocity filters, a finite‐time extended state filter is introduced in this work to estimate the pseudo angular velocity and total uncertain item simultaneously. Then, the developed controller is synthesized based on the recovered information, which does not require the angular velocity for feedback and has the excellent uncertainty and disturbance compensation capability. The global finite‐time stability of the resultant closed‐loop system is evaluated through the Lyapunov direct methodology and homogeneous system theory. Lastly, comparative simulations are carried out to examine the efficiency and superiority of the presented control scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it