MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391886410 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.043

A43 MECHANISMS OF UNIQUE COLONIZATION DYNAMICS AND IMMUNE RESPONSES TO MURIBACULACEAE

2024· article· en· W4391886410 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Popple, Deanna M. Pepin, Hans Ghezzi, Carolina Tropini, Lisa C. Osborne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonizationDynamics (music)Immune systemBiologyPsychologyImmunologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Commercially available probiotics have a limited ability to alter the gut microbiome and establish within a pre-existing microbial community. Increases in osmolality, a condition prevalent in intestinal diseases, depletes the highly abundant bacterial family Muribaculaceae (Mb) from the gut microbiome in a mouse model of short-term osmotic laxative use. Excitingly, despite microbial community re-equilibration in its absence, Mb supersedes other bacterial colonizers to its original abundance if reintroduced, suggesting unique colonization attributes and a potential privileged immune interaction. Aims We aimed to investigate whether and how Mb colonization affects intestinal innate and adaptive immune homeostasis, including the generation of Mb-specific antibodies. Methods To examine interactions between Mb and the immune system that allows for efficient colonization, we used the osmotic laxative polyethylene glycol (PEG) to clear Mb and then generated mice with complex microbiomes that either lack Mb completely (Mb naïve) or were introduced to 8 murine-derived Mb strains (Mb+). The same strains were then introduced to Mb naïve mice (primary exposure to the immune system). To model secondary exposure, Mb+ mice were treated with PEG, and Mb re-introduced 3 weeks later. Leukocytes from the small and large intestinal lamina propria and gut-draining mesenteric lymph nodes (mLNs) were profiled over 21 days to characterize colonization and recolonization dynamics. Results High-throughput 16SrRNA sequencing showed no significant difference between relative abundance of Mb isolates during colonization or recolonization, indicating that Mb is capable of establishing in mice that have never been colonized with it before, making up to 20% of the relative abundance. Broad immunophenotyping demonstrated robust CD11b-CD103+ dendritic cell and Germinal Centre B cell responses in the mLNs of mice seeing Mb for the first time, yet no subsequent plasmablast accumulation in the mLN or lamina propria. We also observed significantly increased type two innate lymphoid cells in the small intestine upon primary exposure to Mb. Recolonization elicited no detectable changes in the monitored populations. Conclusions The lack of immune reactivity upon reintroduction to Mb suggests Mb may evade immune detection upon repeat exposure and contribute to its robust colonization abilities. Determining mechanisms involved in Mb colonization and its impact on host immune responses could increase our understanding of colonization dynamics and highlights the potential of Mb as a model for microbiota reintroduction in therapeutic applications. Funding Agencies Weston Family Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207