MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391888480 · doi:10.1111/edt.12927

The International Association of Dental Traumatology (<scp>IADT</scp>) and the Academy for Sports Dentistry (<scp>ASD</scp>) guidelines for prevention of traumatic dental injuries: Part 7: Orthodontics for the prevention of dental and oral trauma

2024· review· en· W4391888480 on OpenAlexaff
Paul V. Abbott, Nitesh Tewari, Stephen C. Mills, Hans Stasiuk, Mark Roettger, Anne C. O’Connell, Liran Levin

Bibliographic record

VenueDental Traumatology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDental Trauma and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatologyDental traumaMedicineDentistrySports injuryInjury preventionPoison controlOccupational safety and healthSuicide preventionOrthodonticsMedical emergencyPhysical therapyOrthopedic surgeryPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many factors play a role in the cause of traumatic dental injuries (TDI). It is important for dentists to advise patients and their parents about the predisposing risk factors associated with some malocclusions. The vast majority of TDI occur in the maxillary anterior (upper front) teeth in young girls and boys. Two major factors that increase the risk of such injuries are an increased overjet (protruding upper teeth) and lip incompetence (lips do not close easily). Children with other conditions such as severe underbite, open bites, and crossbites are also more susceptible to TDI. Consideration of these predisposing factors leads to the obvious question of whether orthodontic intervention for people with these conditions will help to prevent injuries to their teeth. Orthodontic treatment at an early age through the use of various functional fixed (braces) or removable (plates) appliances can help to reposition the teeth so that they are in a more favorable position and less susceptible to dental injuries. Several scientific reviews have discussed this question. A Cochrane review concluded that “providing early orthodontic treatment for children with prominent upper front teeth is more effective for reducing the incidence of incisal trauma than providing one course of orthodontic treatment in adolescence.” Analia and Liu concluded “that providing early orthodontic treatment/two stages for children with prominent upper front teeth is more effective for reducing the incidence of upper front teeth trauma (incisal trauma) than providing one course of orthodontic treatment in adolescence.” Cobourne et al. concluded that “although early treatment does not result in improved overall outcomes when compared to later treatment, some consideration should be given to starting early when it is thought that there is a real increased risk of dental trauma or a child is being teased because of their overjet.” Hence, there is sound scientific evidence to support early intervention through orthodontic treatment to reduce the likelihood of dental trauma in children whose teeth are in unfavorable positions. However, many other factors must also be considered by the parents and the treating dental practitioners when deciding whether to initiate orthodontic treatment at a young age. All authors contributed to the development of this paper and approved its final form. No funding was received for the presented work. The authors declare there are no competing interests for the above manuscript. No ethics approval was required for this paper. Data sharing not applicable—no new data generated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDental TraumatologySame topicDental Trauma and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207