THE EVERLASTING PEOPLE: G.K. CHESTERTON AND THE FIRST NATIONS. By Matthew J.Milliner. Contributions by David Iglesias, David Hooker, and Amy Peeler. Foreword by Casey Church. Hansen Lectureship Series. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2021. Pp. xxii + 156. Paper, $20.00.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
and crucial archives to reevaluate how racialized structures have ignored how Afro-diasporic religious traditions represent sensorium discourses that problematize simple dichotomies between religion and magic, intentionality and compulsion, and neurological and "folk" wisdom.Pace much "Western" religious discourse that focuses on the brain as the center of devotional and perceptive life, Prez offers a vibrant picture of the gut (which the author expands beyond just the stomach) as a site of serving, perceiving, and knowing gods, spirits, and religious community.For students of Black Atlantic religious traditions, affect theory, philosophy of mind, and religion and colonialism, this is a very useful little guide.Copious cases and rich examples give the book both strength and weakness in that it feels like a chapter to a more expansive book than a quick guide.And yet, The Gut is readable, robust, and akin to Prez's copious examples, beneficial to consume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it