THE EVERLASTING PEOPLE: G.K. CHESTERTON AND THE FIRST NATIONS. By Matthew J.Milliner. Contributions by David Iglesias, David Hooker, and Amy Peeler. Foreword by Casey Church. Hansen Lectureship Series. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2021. Pp. xxii + 156. Paper, $20.00.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
and crucial archives to reevaluate how racialized structures have ignored how Afro-diasporic religious traditions represent sensorium discourses that problematize simple dichotomies between religion and magic, intentionality and compulsion, and neurological and "folk" wisdom.Pace much "Western" religious discourse that focuses on the brain as the center of devotional and perceptive life, Pérez offers a vibrant picture of the gut (which the author expands beyond just the stomach) as a site of serving, perceiving, and knowing gods, spirits, and religious community.For students of Black Atlantic religious traditions, affect theory, philosophy of mind, and religion and colonialism, this is a very useful little guide.Copious cases and rich examples give the book both strength and weakness in that it feels like a chapter to a more expansive book than a quick guide.And yet, The Gut is readable, robust, and akin to Pérez's copious examples, beneficial to consume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.044 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".