Stability and Analytical Characterization of Voriconazole as Measured by Immunoassay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Voriconazole is a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent recommended for invasive fungal diseases, including invasive aspergillosis. Therapeutic drug monitoring via voriconazole target trough concentration is important to ensure efficacy while preventing toxicity. Our aim was to determine the stability of voriconazole as adapted and measured by an immunoassay. METHODS: Plasma from patient samples (n = 45) evaluated by a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was compared against an ARK immunoassay method, adapted and optimized on the Abbott Alinity c analyzer. Stability of voriconazole and analytical performance of ARK immunoassay was assessed, including functional sensitivity, limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantification (LoQ), linearity, and precision. RESULTS: ARK voriconazole immunoassay was highly correlated (Pearson R = 0.988) to the LC-MS/MS method, with an average bias of 0.09 mg/L (2%). CV at LoQ of 0.5 mg/L was 3.7% while the functional sensitivity was established at 0.05 mg/L. Overall imprecision with liquid quality control material obtained from ARK was 5.0%, 6.3%, and 5.9% at 1 mg/L, 5 mg/L, and 10 mg/L, respectively. Limit of blank and LoD were 0.02 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L, respectively. Voriconazole in lithium heparin plasma separator tube declines over time, with a decrease that is more evident near or above toxic concentrations. CONCLUSION: Voriconazole collected in gel separation tubes declines over time, possibly due to absorptive properties. Voriconazole measurements by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS demonstrated acceptable comparability with sufficient level of sensitivity and precision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".