<sup>13</sup> C Metabolic Flux Analysis in Chondrocytes Reveals a Novel Switch in Metabolic Phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chondrocytes are typically known for their anaerobic metabolism both in vivo and under culture conditions in vitro. However, chondrocytes have been shown to display greater biosynthetic activity when subjected to conditions that elicit aerobic metabolism. We have previously shown that tissue formation by chondrocytes can be upregulated by controlling nutrient availability and that this response arises from changes in glucose metabolism. The aim of the present study was to further characterize these changes through 13C-metabolic flux analysis (13C-MFA), as well as to determine the most optimal response. Primary bovine chondrocytes were grown in scaffold-free high-density tissue culture. [U-13C] glucose labeling experiments were combined with a tissue-specific metabolic network model to carry out 13C-MFA under varying levels of nutrient availability. 13C-MFA results demonstrated that when subjected to increasing nutrient availability, chondrocytes switch from a predominately anaerobic to a mixed aerobic–anaerobic phenotype. This metabolic switch was attributed to the saturation of the lactate fermentation pathway and metabolite overflow toward the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This effect appears to be similar to, but the inverse of, the Crabtree effect (“inverse Crabtree effect”). The relationships between metabolic flux and nutrient availability were then utilized to identify culture conditions that promote enhanced tissue formation. This novel metabolic effect presents a simple but effective approach for enhancing the biosynthetic response of chondrocytes—a key requirement to develop functional engineered cartilaginous tissue for joint resurfacing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".