Bibliographic record
Abstract
«In "Post-2000 Poetry of Dissent," Dr Abha Prakash’s student-focussed explication of poems proceeds comparatively, identifying ways in which pairs of poems from the A-level syllabus address thematically similar phenomena or ideas while the poems’ uniquenesses are thus thrown into relief. Prakash’s helpful elucidations particularly highlight questions of specific power relations or societal injustices the individual poets are scrutinizing and directly or indirectly critiquing. Her essays instructively model approaches to poems for students developing literary critical skills.» (Susan Gingell, PhD, Professor Emerita and Master Teacher, University of Saskatchewan) «The best 21st-century poets confront edgy and difficult topics that reflect the realities of our time. Abha Prakash’s clear and accessible critiques offer readers a reliable and sensitive guide to the complex questions these poets raise, while also showing how poetic techniques shape each poem’s unique form and expression.» (Anthony John Harding, Professor Emeritus, University of Saskatchewan) An insightful critique of contemporary award-winning poetry published between 2000 and 2011 by British poets, this resource text offers a critical appreciation of 28 poems that form part of the anthology, Poems of the Decade, which are studied by A level students in the UK and international centres each year. All the 28 poems express varying degrees of dissent, in theme, style, and techniques. They also offer interesting lines of discussion and debate in the AS English classroom. This is a book of original analytical perspectives by an experienced English Literature teacher who expertly identifies each poem’s implicit and explicit context, as well as its unique response to our twenty-first century world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".