MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391921795 · doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01603-6

MRI-based synthetic CT for assessment of the bony elements of the sacroiliac joints in children

2024· article· en· W4391921795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInsights into Imaging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta Hospital
FundersUniversiteit Gent
KeywordsMedicineSacroiliac jointLumbosacral jointKappaFacet jointCervical vertebraeSacrumNuclear medicineFacet (psychology)Cohen's kappaSpinal canalRadiographyNeuroradiologyRadiologyAnatomySpinal cordLumbarMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to assess the equivalency of MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) to conventional CT for sacroiliac joint bony morphology assessment in children. METHODS: A prospective study was performed. Children who had (PET-)CT-scan underwent additional MRI. sCT-CT image quality was analyzed by two readers subjectively overall, semi-quantitatively in terms of cortical delineation, joint facet defects, growth plate fusion, ossified nuclei, lumbosacral transitional anomaly, and bony bridges, and quantitatively for disc space height, spinal canal width, and sacral vertebrae width and height. Cohen's kappa and equivalence analyses with Bland-Altman plots were calculated for categorical and continuous measures respectively. RESULTS: Ten patients were included (6 boys; aged 9-16 years; mean age 14 years). Overall sCT image quality was rated good. Semi-quantitative assessment of cortical delineation of sacroiliac joints, bony bridges, and joint facet defects on the right iliac and sacral sides showed perfect agreement. Correlation was good to excellent (kappa 0.615-1) for the presence of lumbosacral transitional anomaly, fusion of sacral growth plates, joint facet defect, and presence of ossified nuclei. sCT-CT measurements were statistically equivalent and within the equivalence margins (-1-1 mm) for intervertebral disc space height and spinal canal width. Intra- and inter-reader reliability was excellent for quantitative assessment (0.806 < ICC < 0.998). For categorical scoring, kappa ranged from substantial to excellent (0.615-1). CONCLUSION: sCT appears to be visually equivalent to CT for the assessment of pediatric sacroiliac joints. sCT may aid in visualizing sacroiliac joints compared to conventional MRI, with the benefit that no ionizing radiation is used, especially important in children. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI-based synthetic CT, a new technique that generates CT-like images without ionizing radiation, appears to be visually equivalent to CT for assessment of normal pediatric sacroiliac joints and can potentially assess structural damage as it clearly depicts bony cortex. KEY POINTS: • MRI-based sCT is a new image technique that can generate CT-like images. • We found that sCT performs similarly to CT in displaying bony structures of pediatric sacroiliac joints. • sCT has already been clinically validated in the sacroiliac joints in adults. • sCT can potentially assess structural damage from erosions or ankylosis as it clearly depicts bony cortex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it