MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391922244 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54640-6

Transductive meta-learning with enhanced feature ensemble for few-shot semantic segmentation

2024· article· en· W4391922244 on OpenAlexafffund
Amin Karimi, Charalambos Poullis

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationShot (pellet)Feature (linguistics)Ensemble learningPattern recognition (psychology)Semantic featureMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses few-shot semantic segmentation and proposes a novel transductive end-to-end method that overcomes three key problems affecting performance. First, we present a novel ensemble of visual features learned from pretrained classification and semantic segmentation networks with the same architecture. Our approach leverages the varying discriminative power of these networks, resulting in rich and diverse visual features that are more informative than a pretrained classification backbone that is not optimized for dense pixel-wise classification tasks used in most state-of-the-art methods. Secondly, the pretrained semantic segmentation network serves as a base class extractor, which effectively mitigates false positives that occur during inference time and are caused by base objects other than the object of interest. Thirdly, a two-step segmentation approach using transductive meta-learning is presented to address the episodes with poor similarity between the support and query images. The proposed transductive meta-learning method addresses the prediction by first learning the relationship between labeled and unlabeled data points with matching support foreground to query features (intra-class similarity) and then applying this knowledge to predict on the unlabeled query image (intra-object similarity), which simultaneously learns propagation and false positive suppression. To evaluate our method, we performed experiments on benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate significant improvement with minimal trainable parameters of 2.98M. Specifically, using Resnet-101, we achieve state-of-the-art performance for both 1-shot and 5-shot Pascal-[Formula: see text], as well as for 1-shot and 5-shot COCO-[Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningFrench-language works237,207