Transomics2cytoscape: an automated software for interpretable 2.5-dimensional visualization of trans-omic networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biochemical network visualization is one of the essential technologies for mechanistic interpretation of omics data. In particular, recent advances in multi-omics measurement and analysis require the development of visualization methods that encompass multiple omics data. Visualization in 2.5 dimension (2.5D visualization), which is an isometric view of stacked X-Y planes, is a convenient way to interpret multi-omics/trans-omics data in the context of the conventional layouts of biochemical networks drawn on each of the stacked omics layers. However, 2.5D visualization of trans-omics networks is a state-of-the-art method that primarily relies on time-consuming human efforts involving manual drawing. Here, we present an R Bioconductor package 'transomics2cytoscape' for automated visualization of 2.5D trans-omics networks. We confirmed that transomics2cytoscape could be used for rapid visualization of trans-omics networks presented in published papers within a few minutes. Transomics2cytoscape allows for frequent update/redrawing of trans-omics networks in line with the progress in multi-omics/trans-omics data analysis, thereby enabling network-based interpretation of multi-omics data at each research step. The transomics2cytoscape source code is available at https://github.com/ecell/transomics2cytoscape .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".