Transomics2cytoscape: an automated software for interpretable 2.5-dimensional visualization of trans-omic networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biochemical network visualization is one of the essential technologies for mechanistic interpretation of omics data. In particular, recent advances in multi-omics measurement and analysis require the development of visualization methods that encompass multiple omics data. Visualization in 2.5 dimension (2.5D visualization), which is an isometric view of stacked X-Y planes, is a convenient way to interpret multi-omics/trans-omics data in the context of the conventional layouts of biochemical networks drawn on each of the stacked omics layers. However, 2.5D visualization of trans-omics networks is a state-of-the-art method that primarily relies on time-consuming human efforts involving manual drawing. Here, we present an R Bioconductor package 'transomics2cytoscape' for automated visualization of 2.5D trans-omics networks. We confirmed that transomics2cytoscape could be used for rapid visualization of trans-omics networks presented in published papers within a few minutes. Transomics2cytoscape allows for frequent update/redrawing of trans-omics networks in line with the progress in multi-omics/trans-omics data analysis, thereby enabling network-based interpretation of multi-omics data at each research step. The transomics2cytoscape source code is available at https://github.com/ecell/transomics2cytoscape .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it