MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391942367 · doi:10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100042

Short-Acting Beta-Agonists, Antibiotics, Oral Corticosteroids, and the Associated Burden of COPD

2024· article· en· W4391942367 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mohit Bhutani, Arsh Randhawa, Manisha Talukdar, Phongsack Manivong, Danielle Fearon, Aaron Gelfand, Erin Graves, Suzanne McMullen, Irvin Mayers

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Pulmonary · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsAstraZeneca (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersAstraZeneca CanadaAstraZeneca
KeywordsCOPDAntibioticsMedicineBETA (programming language)Inhaled corticosteroidsIntensive care medicineCorticosteroidPharmacologyInternal medicineMicrobiologyBiologyAsthmaComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Severe acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) are key events that drive health care resource use (HCRU) and negatively impact patients' quality of life. Research Question: What is the real-world burden of COPD relative to patients' medication history, specifically, exposure to short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), antibiotics, and oral corticosteroids (OCSs)? Study Design and Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients in Alberta, Canada, identified as having COPD based on administrative health care data (April 1, 2011-March 31, 2019). The risk of severe AECOPDs over 90 days (COPD events resulting in hospitalization or ED visits) and COPD-specific HCRU were studied relative to prior-year SABA, antibiotic, and OCS history. Results: One hundred eighty-eight thousand nine hundred sixty-nine patients identified with COPD were identified (mean ± SD age, 68.8 ± 13.0 years). After controlling for age, sex, calendar year at index, comorbidities at index, and prior severe AECOPDs, patients with frequent SABA, antibiotic, or OCS exposure in a given year showed significantly higher 90-day risks of severe AECOPDs in a positively associated relationship. Patients with the highest SABA exposure (≥ 6 canisters in a given year) showed twice the rate of severe AECOPDs as patients with 1 SABA canister (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.06; 95% CI, 2.01-2.11). The 90-day rates of severe AECOPDs were 51% higher for patients with ≥ 6 vs 1 to 2 antibiotic dispensations (IRR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.48-1.55) and 3% higher for patients with ≥ 6 vs 1 to 5 OCS burst days (IRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06). Mean annualized rates of hospitalization and ED visits were highest for patients dispensed ≥ 6 (vs fewer) SABA canisters or antibiotics and patients with any OCS burst days in a given year. Interpretation: Histories of frequent or prolonged exposure to SABAs, antibiotics, or OCSs were associated with higher rates of severe AECOPDs and HCRU.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCHEST PulmonarySame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207