High-Q Tamm plasmon-like resonance in spherical Bragg microcavity resonators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work proposes what we believe to be a novel Tamm plasmon-like resonance supporting structure consisting of an Au/SiO 2 core-shell metal nanosphere structure surrounded by a TiO 2 /SiO 2 spherical Bragg resonator (SBR). The cavity formed between the core metal particle and the SBR supports a localized mode similar to Tamm plasmons in planar dielectric multilayers. Theoretical simulations reveal a sharp absorption peak in the SBR bandgap region, associated with this mode, together with strong local field enhancement. We studied the modification of a dipolar electric emitter's radiative and non-radiative decay rates in this resonant structure, resulting in a quantum efficiency of ∼90% for a dipole at a distance of r =60 n m from the Au nanosphere surface. A 30-layer metal-SBR Tamm plasmon-like resonant supporting structure results in a Q up to ∼10 3 . The Tamm plasmon-like mode is affected by the Bragg wavelength and the number of layers of the SBR, and the thickness of the spacer cavity layer. These results will open a new avenue for generating high- Q Tamm plasmon-like modes for switches, optical logic computing devices, and nonlinear applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".