MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391954194 · doi:10.1134/s0001433823120034

Influence of Wind and Yukon River Runoff on Water Exchange between the Bering and Chukchi Seas

2023· article· en· W4391954194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А. Г. Андреев, I. I. Pipko

Bibliographic record

VenueIzvestiya Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)OceanographyGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An analysis of water exchange between the Bering (Pacific Ocean) and Chukchi (Arctic Ocean) seas in the summer was carried out using satellite data on sea level, geostrophic currents, and measurement data of water transport in the Bering Strait. It is shown that there is good agreement (r = 0.85, July–October 1997−2019) between the velocities of geostrophic currents (satellite data) and measurements of water transport (buoy station data) through the Bering Strait. It has been established that the temporal variability of water transport through the Bering Strait is determined by sea level variations in the southern part of the Chukchi Sea (66°–68° N, 170°–172° W). Strengthening of the eastern (western) winds is accompanied by a decrease (increase) in the sea level in the southern part of the Chukchi Sea and, as a result, an increase (decrease) in the flow of water through the Bering Strait. An increase (decrease) in the flow of the Yukon River is accompanied by a rise (decrease) in sea level and changes in water circulation in the northern Bering Sea and the southern Chukchi Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIzvestiya Atmospheric and Oceanic PhysicsSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207