MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391960719 · doi:10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00169

Evaluating the efficacy of Rho kinase inhibitor eye drops in the management of corneal edema: A single-center retrospective cohort study

2024· article· en· W4391960719 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Itay Lavy, Nir Erdinest, Jamel Corredores, Denise Wajnsztajn, David Smadja

Bibliographic record

VenueTaiwan Journal of Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationHebrew University of Jerusalem
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyRetrospective cohort studySingle CenterEdemaIntraocular pressureSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ripasudil in managing various corneal edema conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted at Hadassah Medical Center and involved 16 patients with 17 eyes. Patients were selected based on diagnostic criteria, primarily corneal edema. The conditions were as follows, listed by frequency: postcataract surgery (31.25%), postpenetrating keratoplasty (25%), post-Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (18.75%), Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (12.5%), status post-Ahmed glaucoma valve (6.25%), and status posttrabeculectomy (6.25%). The treatment regimen involved topical administration of ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate (Glanatec ® 0.4%), administered three times a day or tailored to condition severity. Efficacy was assessed using pre- and posttreatment measurements of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell count (ECC), along with slit-lamp and optical coherence tomography examinations. RESULTS: The average duration of ripasudil treatment was approximately 4.9 ± 2.2 months. Significant improvements were observed in BCVA, changing from a pretreatment value of 1.106 ± 0.817 logMAR to a posttreatment value of 0.56 ± 0.57 logMAR ( P = 0.0308). CCT also showed a significant reduction, from 619.50 ± 56.36 μm pretreatment to 572.5 ± 75.48 μm posttreatment ( P = 0.0479). ECC showed a marginal but not statistically significant increase, from 849.00 ± 570.72 cells/mm² pretreatment to 874.75 ± 625.59 cells/mm² posttreatment ( P = 0.9010). CONCLUSION: The study provides robust evidence supporting the use of ripasudil in managing corneal edema. Significant improvements in key ocular metrics such as BCVA and CCT were observed, enhancing the overall quality of life for patients suffering from various forms of corneal edema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTaiwan Journal of OphthalmologySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207