MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391960719 · doi:10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00169

Evaluating the efficacy of Rho kinase inhibitor eye drops in the management of corneal edema: A single-center retrospective cohort study

2024· article· en· W4391960719 on OpenAlex
Itay Lavy, Nir Erdinest, Jamel Corredores, Denise Wajnsztajn, David Smadja

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTaiwan Journal of Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationHebrew University of Jerusalem
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyRetrospective cohort studySingle CenterEdemaIntraocular pressureSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ripasudil in managing various corneal edema conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted at Hadassah Medical Center and involved 16 patients with 17 eyes. Patients were selected based on diagnostic criteria, primarily corneal edema. The conditions were as follows, listed by frequency: postcataract surgery (31.25%), postpenetrating keratoplasty (25%), post-Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (18.75%), Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (12.5%), status post-Ahmed glaucoma valve (6.25%), and status posttrabeculectomy (6.25%). The treatment regimen involved topical administration of ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate (Glanatec ® 0.4%), administered three times a day or tailored to condition severity. Efficacy was assessed using pre- and posttreatment measurements of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell count (ECC), along with slit-lamp and optical coherence tomography examinations. RESULTS: The average duration of ripasudil treatment was approximately 4.9 ± 2.2 months. Significant improvements were observed in BCVA, changing from a pretreatment value of 1.106 ± 0.817 logMAR to a posttreatment value of 0.56 ± 0.57 logMAR ( P = 0.0308). CCT also showed a significant reduction, from 619.50 ± 56.36 μm pretreatment to 572.5 ± 75.48 μm posttreatment ( P = 0.0479). ECC showed a marginal but not statistically significant increase, from 849.00 ± 570.72 cells/mm² pretreatment to 874.75 ± 625.59 cells/mm² posttreatment ( P = 0.9010). CONCLUSION: The study provides robust evidence supporting the use of ripasudil in managing corneal edema. Significant improvements in key ocular metrics such as BCVA and CCT were observed, enhancing the overall quality of life for patients suffering from various forms of corneal edema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it