MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391990665 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1780303

Reconstruction of Clival Resorption with Pontine Pneumatosis Secondary to Cocaine-Induced Skull Base Defect

2024· article· en· W4391990665 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulrahman Almansouri, Alex C. Tham, Abdulaziz Abobotain, Mashael Almarwani, Marc A. Tewfik, Denis Sirhan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkullMedicineResorptionClivusBase (topology)AnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Intranasal cocaine use can result in various degrees of destructive craniofacial lesions. Direct irritation and local vasoconstriction commonly affect nasal mucosa without intracranial extension. Heavy cocaine usage resulting in destructive skull base lesions affecting the intracranial compartment has been reported. We describe the surgical management of complete clival resorption and associated pontine pneumatosis secondary to prolonged cocaine use. Case Presentation: A 41-year-old man presented with mild dysarthria and ataxic gait; there was no clinical evidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The patient reported cocaine use over the last 20 years. Computed tomography (CT) of the head along with CT angiography showed complete clival destruction, air in the pons and filling defects in the distal basilar artery ( Fig. 1A, B ). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed restriction on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences and partial enhancement with edema on T1-weighted with contrast and T2-weighted sequences ( Fig. 1C, D ). Nasal endoscopy revealed a large perforation of the nasal septum, a missing left inferior turbinate, and crusting with surrounding mucous overlying the clival defect in the nasopharynx ( Fig. 2A ). Surgical repair of the defect was planned via a combined open and endoscopic approach and reconstruction using a pericranial flap. Anatomical constraints precluded a nasoseptal flap as a viable option. Postoperatively the patient had transient right hemi-body weakness that resolved spontaneously. Tissue cultures were equivocal and only grew normal flora. He was nonetheless started on a six-week course of wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy. The patient consented to anonymous use of this clinical information for purposes of education and publication. Surgical Technique: Surgery was performed in the supine position with the head fixed in a clamp. The length of the required pericranial flap was determined preoperatively using preoperative imaging ( Fig. 3A, B ). A bicoronal skin incision was done extending more posteriorly than usual to harvest a large enough graft. Next, we proceeded with a full house left functional endoscopic sinus surgery. This provided access to the left half of the anterior skull base. The clival defect (1 × 1 cm. was explored and prepared to receive the pericranial flap. Next, we harvested a unilateral pericranial flap and passed it into the left nasal cavity by drilling a bony window in the glabella. Under endoscopic guidance, the left pericranial flap was then laid along the left anterior skull base, lateral to the left middle turbinate, all the way to the clival defect at its distal tip. The clival defect was repaired in a multilayered fashion. Two layers of fascia lata were placed, one at a time, onto the clival defect as an onlay followed by the left pericranial flap. Valsalva maneuver revealed that the left pericranial flap provided a seal with no clinical evidence of CSF leak ( Fig. 2B ). At 1-year follow-up, an MRI showed reduced inflammation ( Fig. 4A, B ). Conclusion: Combined endoscopic–open clival reconstruction is a feasible option in cases where there is complete clival destruction secondary to substance use. Publication History Article published online: 05 February 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseSame topicHead and Neck Surgical OncologyFrench-language works237,207