MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391995577 · doi:10.1111/cag.12908

Environmental philosophy in desperate times By JustinPack, Peterborough: Broadview Press. 2022. 186 pages. $26.50 (paperback). ISBN: 97815548145364

2024· article· en· W4391995577 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Martina Jakubchik‐Paloheimo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)Art historyCitationLibrary scienceArtMedia studiesSociologyComputer scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental philosophy in desperate times is written as a handbook for students or instructors in the field, introducing the basics of environmental philosophy. It outlines the leading theorists and provides a snapshot of the essential arguments surrounding environmental issues while exploring the philosophies that have led to the present climate crisis. Justin Pack aptly contextualizes contemporary environmental thought by guiding the reader through the foundational texts that have shaped it, such as Indigenous metaphysics, epistemology and ethics, ecofeminism, deep ecology, food ethics, animal liberation, and ecocentrism. Environmental philosophy provides a literature review that offers the reader a simple understanding of its theories and movements, organized into three different sections: “The Death of the cosmos,” “Environmental theories,” and “Environmental movements.” Pack provides the reader with some hope as he walks us through the field's evolution without losing sight of the urgency of the current situation. He gives a summary of seminal conversations, from Rachel Carson's Silent spring (1962), which spoke to the malpractice of then-modern chemical agriculture, to Arne Naess's (1986) Eight principles for deep ecology, which called for spiritual and philosophical reform of our epistemic relation to ecosystems; and Peter Singer's (1975) Animal liberation that critiqued speciesism and called for a utilitarian approach to end animal exploitation. The book also addresses current climate change debates, proposing an optimistic discourse that questions our Western-centric view of the universe, including the economic privilege that exploits the commons. Pack analyzes the intersection of racism with geographies of ignorance to explain how this line of linking or lack thereof contributes to thoughtlessness and a lack of ethical consideration for the Earth, highlighting the overall need for greater education on environmental issues. Pack calls out this general ambivalence of humanity's anthropocentric terracide "killing the Earth without fearing and hating nature" (p. 140). On page 121, he provides the reader with Faye Lessler's list of not-for-profits to get involved in different environmental movements for readers who wish to break through their indifference (Green Dreamer, 2012). Overall, the book is an ambitious undertaking, but Pack delivers the essential touchstones from critical thinkers across the discipline, providing an excellent primer for the field. Furthermore, Pack does an excellent job analyzing how Western colonial thought has led to the current environmental state. He details the critiques of Deloria Jr. and other formative Indigenous scholars of the denigration of Indigenous thought through anthropological thinking, how epistemic oppression has marginalized Indigenous science, and how diverse Indigenous epistemologies demonstrate relationships to the more than human world through place and can provide renewed ethical guidelines. Missing, though, is an acknowledgement of some more recent contributions of Indigenous and BIPOC communities to environmental theoretical discourse. The environmental movement, philosophy, and theory are being radically rethought through Indigenous knowledge generation, disruption, and activism. The last two sections of this book lack this vital context. Absent from the book are discussions of newer developments surrounding decolonial thinking, the coloniality of climate change, and concepts such as two-eyed seeing, for example—the only fault in an otherwise thorough introduction to this subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennesSame topicEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207