MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392002860 · doi:10.5539/eer.v14n1p1

Energy, Exergy and Economic Analysis of a Mixed-mode Natural Convection Solar Tunnel Dryer for Banana Slices

2024· article· en· W4392002860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Environment Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExergyMode (computer interface)Natural (archaeology)Natural convectionExergy efficiencyEnergy (signal processing)ConvectionComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsThermodynamicsGeologyMathematicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy, exergy and economic analysis of a mixed-mode natural convection solar tunnel dryer for drying banana slices is presented. The collector, drying chamber and chimney energy and exergy are analysed for a load of 3.75 kg of fresh banana slices. Further, the economic analysis in terms of Net Present Value (NPV), Profitability Index (PI), the Payback Period (PB) and the Discounted Payback Period are presented. Drying experiments were done in a period of two days. During the experiment, solar radiation varied from 206.1 W/m2 to 934.5 W/m2; drying chamber temperature varied from 51.7ºC to 81.84ºC while the ambient temperature varied from 21.7ºC to 31.9ºC. The relative humidity ranged from 4.63% to 28.46% for the drying chamber and, 14.9% to 31.8% for the ambient. Under these conditions, the moisture content of the bananas was reduced from 73.89% to 14.27% in seven hours of drying on the first day. Energy and exergy efficiencies ranged from 5.56% to 57.32%, and 0.33% to 2.81%, respectively on Day 1. For Day 2 the energy and exergy efficiencies were from 14.15% to 59.16%, and 0.75% to 3.76%, respectively. For the drying chamber, the efficiency increased gradually in the first two hours to a maximum of 5.36%, corresponding to the period when there was maximum evaporation. The chimney, which is a bare flat plate type without glazing and insulation, lost heat from its surfaces. Nonetheless, it generated enough buoyancy to move air through the dryer. With the solar dryer lifespan of 10 years and the Discounted Payback Period of four years, the project is attractive and worth investing in.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it