Characterizing deep groundwater using evidence from oil and gas exploration wells in the Lower Kutai Basin of Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Groundwater at depths exceeding 500 m can be an important source of freshwater. However, the characteristics of deep groundwater in many regions of the world, including Indonesia’s sedimentary basins, remain vaguely defined. This study investigates the pressure regimes, hydraulic head distributions, salinity, and hydrochemical facies of deep groundwater using available evidence from oil and gas exploration wells in the Lower Kutai Basin of Indonesia. Pressure measurements and wireline log data reveal three pressure regimes within the basin: hydrostatic, overpressure, and underpressure. The top of the overpressure varies, from close to the surface onshore to depths of ~4.5 and ~3.8 km in the Mahakam Delta and offshore, respectively. Computed hydraulic heads at the top of the overpressure range from ~191 m above sea level onshore to ~71 m below sea level offshore, and are indicative of regional groundwater flow. The observed salinity of deep groundwater within the basin indicates predominantly brackish or saline conditions. Fresh (total dissolved solids < 1 g/L) groundwater to a depth of ~2 km is found at a small minority of wells onshore and in the delta; no fresh groundwater is found offshore. Four hydrochemical facies are observed: Na+/Cl–, Ca2+/Cl–, Na+/HCO3–, and Na+–Ca2+/HCO3–. This study indicates that deep fresh groundwater in the Lower Kutai Basin is of localized occurrence. Recharge from meteoric water may replenish deep fresh groundwater within the hydrostatic zone and sustain water supplies, whether brackish or fresh. Water produced from clay diagenesis is also cited as a possible process of freshening deep groundwater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".