MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392018498 · doi:10.31995/jgv.2023.v14is3.007

Effect of Circuit Training on the Basis of Motor Skills (Speed) and Skill Abilitied (Dribbling) of School Football Players of Mumbai

2023· article· en· W4392018498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nilesh Lohar, Nikita Dandekar

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL GLOBAL VALUES · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFootballFootball playersPsychologyMotor skillCircuit trainingApplied psychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineDevelopmental psychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Football is one of the well-known games across world. Football also known as Soccer or European Football in USA and Canada. There are certain rules and regulation for playing this game. Firstly, required two teams with sixteen players; 11 on field and 5 substitutes. This game using Spherical ball of 67-70 cm of circumference for playing. The game has to played in between of two goal post. And game started by kick off. There are some fundamental skills using for the game on field by the players like heading, dribbling, kicking, passing, defending, goal keeping etc. when ball crosses the goal line by team scored as goal. When both teams have scored equal goals means tie happened then there are methods to solved or break the tie by extra time, penalty shoot and sudden death. The purpose of study was to determine the effect of circuit training on speed and dribbling of school football players aged 14 to 16 years. A sample of Forty (n=40) school football players age ranged 14 to 16 years was identified as subjects from Arsenal football academy Mira road, area of suburban Mumbai. further they had been randomly divided into two identical corporations i.e. experimental and manipulate institution with same variety of topics. Experimental organization (circuit education institution (n=20)) and control group (non-circuit education institution (n=20)). The layout of the have a look at changed into Non- equivalent manage organization design. The experimental topics in conjunction with day these days lifestyles underwent a Circuit schooling programmed for 3 days in per week. The collected records changed into analysis with assist of ‘t’ test. The end result revealed that the effect of circuit schooling programmers helped to enhance velocity and dribbling talent of football gamers elderly 14 to 16 years. The findings finish that the circuit schooling turned into found beneficial to improve speed and dribbling of football players aged 14 to 16 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL GLOBAL VALUESSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207