MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392024252 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2024.3368475

Knowledge-Based Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for Conformal Antenna Array Diagnosis

2024· article· en· W4392024252 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Sichuan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDiscriminatorGenerator (circuit theory)Computer scienceConformal mapGenerative grammarAntenna (radio)Generative adversarial networkArtificial intelligenceAdversarial systemPattern recognition (psychology)Conformal antennaMachine learningDeep learningMathematicsRadiation patternTelecommunicationsPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we propose a novel machine learning (ML)-based method for real-time diagnosis of impaired conformal antenna arrays. An improved conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) is first applied to the array diagnosis. Specifically, a generator is used to generate the diagnosed excitations, and a discriminator is used to determine whether the diagnosed excitations are real. The impaired far-field pattern is sampled to be fed as conditions into the discriminator and generator. Additionally, as prior knowledge, the sparsity of the impaired pattern is used to improve the proposed network and to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Examples of diagnosis and comparisons with existing ML-based techniques demonstrate that the proposed approach has a higher diagnostic accuracy, even with a smaller number of measurements

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it