MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synthetic Dataset for Quadcopter Detection Based on Frequency Propeller Signature

2023· article· en· W4392025084 on OpenAlexaff
Marc-Antoine Drouin, Marc‐André Rainville, Michel Picard, Terrence C. Stewart, Frank Billy Djupkep Dizeu, Guillaume Gagné

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadcopterComputer scienceSignature (topology)PropellerArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsAerospace engineeringMarine engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of computer graphic tools typically associated with video games is a popular method to generate synthetic datasets for the training of machine learning algorithms. For optical detection of quadcopters, realistic imagery needs to be generated for multiple models of drones, in multiple types of environments and different flight profiles. By itself, the effort required to generate those virtual environments can be as important as flying actual drones. This is particularly true when a physics-based engine is required to model the behavior of the propellers. While some appearance-based drone detection methods may not need accurate propeller behavior, other detection methods that exploit the high-frequency and/or temporal signatures generated by rotating propellers do require such accurate simulations. This is especially the case for neuromorphic sensors, which are generally sensitive to the unique high-frequency visual signal from the propeller blades. We propose a synthetic approach to acquire training datasets for neuromorphic sensors using a flexible hardware system built from quadcopter components. This system allows efficient acquisition of training sets for drone detection sensors based on the propeller’s temporal and/or frequency signature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207