MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reply on RC1/RC2

2024· peer-review· en· W4392030006 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kaley Walker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) is currently providing the only measurements of vertically resolved chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22) from space. This study assesses the ACE-FTS HCFC-22 v5.2 product in the upper troposphere – lower stratosphere, as well as the simulated concentrations of HCFC-22 from a 39-year specified dynamics run of the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM39) in the same region. In general, ACE-FTS HCFC-22 observations tend to agree with subsampled CMAM39 data to within ±5 %, except for between ~15 and 25 km in the extratropical regions where ACE-FTS exhibits a negative bias of 5–30 %, and near 6 km in the tropics where ACE FTS exhibits a bias of 15 %. When comparing against correlative satellite, aircraft, and balloon data, ACE-FTS typically exhibits a low bias on the order of 0–10 % between ~5–15 km and is within ±15 % between ~15–25 km. ACE-FTS, CMAM39, and surface flask measurements from the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory’s surface air-sampling network, all exhibit consistent tropospheric HCFC-22 trends ranging between 6.8 and 7.8 pptv/year (within 95 % confidence) for 2004–2012, and between 3.1 and 4.7 pptv/year (within 95 % confidence) for 2012–2018. Interhemispheric differences (IHD) of HCFC-22 concentrations were also derived using ACE-FTS, NOAA, and CMAM39 data, and all three yielded consistent and correlated (r≥0.42) IHD timeseries, with the results indicating that surface IHD values decreased at a rate of 2.2±1.1 pptv/decade between 2004 and 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0300.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.121

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy→French-language works237,207→