Harmonizing body surface area assessments between the Eczema Area and Severity Index, <scp>SCORing</scp> Atopic Dermatitis, and handprint methods utilizing one shared <scp>measurement—A</scp> proposal to improve efficiency and reduce error in atopic dermatitis trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detailed breakdown of body region contributions to the total body surface area as estimated by the EASI (left) and SCORAD (middle, right).Values presented are original numbers to the EASI and the rule of nines utilized in the SCORAD in the 1993 innagural report (middle), and the 1997 update (right).Numbers in parentheses depict appropriate values for the paediatric scale of each instrument for patients below the age of eight (EASI) and the age of two (SCORAD).Numbers in red are included in the body region in which they are present and do not add to the total BSA.The regions connected by brackets in the SCORAD can be combined to give 4 regions, as in the EASI.Note the differences in the anatomy included in each measure with the buttocks included in the lower extremities of the EASI and included in the trunk measure of the SCORAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".