MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392058550 · doi:10.1002/adsr.202300167

Light‐Up Sensing Citrate Using a Capture‐Selected DNA Aptamer

2024· article· en· W4392058550 on OpenAlexafffund
Lide Gu, Yao Zhang, Deli Wang, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Sensor Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of WaterlooChina Sponsorship Council
KeywordsAptamerDNAChemistryComputational biologyComputer scienceMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Citrate is a key metabolite and nutrient in humans. Its level is associated with many diseases from tumor growth to bone diseases. Detection of citrate has relied on its high negative charge, metal chelating properties and as an enzyme substrate. In this work, the capture‐selection method is used to isolate DNA aptamers for citrate. After 18 rounds of selection, a highly converged library is obtained and the first two sequences reached 99.6% of the library. Using the most abundant sequence named CA1, thioflavin T fluorescence spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry show dissociation constants of 7.4 and 4.4 µ m citrate, respectively. CA1 does not require sodium for binding but requires 1.0 m m magnesium. Among the tested carboxylate molecules, only citrate can bind to the aptamer. A light‐up fluorescence strand displacement biosensor is developed and it can detect citrate in simulated urine with a detection limit of 1.1 µ m . This short 42‐nucleotide aptamer can be readily adapted to other types of sensing mechanisms for the detection of citrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Sensor ResearchSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207