MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392059334 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.103578

Research Note: Clostridium perfringens NetB and CnaA neutralizing nanobodies in feed reduce the incidence of poultry necrotic enteritis

2024· article· en· W4392059334 on OpenAlexaff
Slade A. Loutet, Sylvia T. Cheung, Sarah J. M. Zaytsoff, Charles L. Hofacre, Matthew Jones, Filip Van Petegem, Hamlet Abnousi

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)University of British ColumbiaiCo Therapeutics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridium perfringensMicrobiologyBiologyPichia pastorisBacillus subtilisAntibodyToxinEnteritisBacterial adhesinGastrointestinal tractBacteriaRecombinant DNAEscherichia coliGeneBiochemistryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Necrotic enteritis is a devastating disease to poultry caused by the bacterium Clostridium perfringens. As a novel approach to combating poultry necrotic enteritis, we identified and characterized several hundred single domain antibody fragments (or nanobodies) capable of binding either the NetB toxin or the collagen-binding adhesin (CnaA) of C. perfringens. Many of the nanobodies could neutralize the in vitro functions of NetB or CnaA with inhibitory concentrations in the nanomolar range. The nanobodies were also screened for proteolytic stability in an extract derived from gastrointestinal tract fluids of chickens. A collection of 6 nanobodies (4 targeting NetB and 2 targeting CnaA) with high neutralizing activity and high gastrointestinal tract extract stability were expressed and secreted by Pichia pastoris or Bacillus subtilis. Chickens were given a feed with 1 of the 2 nanobody-containing groups: 1) nanobody-containing P. pastoris supernatants that were semi-purified, lyophilized, and enterically coated, or 2) B. subtilis spores from strains containing the nanobody genes. Compared to untreated chickens (23.75% mortality), mortality of chickens receiving feed modified with the P. pastoris and B. subtilis products decreased to 11.25 and 7.5%, respectively. These results offer a new opportunity to improve the control of poultry necrotic enteritis by incorporating highly specific nanobodies or bacteria expressing these nanobodies directly into chicken feed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207