Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book is the result of what began as an investigation into the various ways the New Testament Apocalypse has been inscribed into Argentine narrative.It became immediately obvious that Leopoldo Marechal's "apocalyptic" novels were strikingly different in tone and intent by comparison with the work of other Argentine novelists such as Roberto Arlt, Ernesto Sábato, and Eduardo Mallea, all of whom invoke apocalyptic motifs to convey themes of crisis and disaster in society and the world at large.In other words, these novelists use apocalypse in what must be called a conventional way, in accord with the "great code," as Northrop Frye calls the typological rhetoric bequeathed us by the Christian bible.Marechal, by contrast, employs the heavy artillery of apocalypse in apparently banal contexts, evidently with ironic intent.Just how deep Marechal's irony cuts and what it means is the question this study attempts to address.But is it justifiable to devote a monograph to the novels of Leopoldo Marechal?Marechal is not well known outside Argentina, though many critics have acknowledged -briefly, sometimes begrudgingly -his importance as a precursor of the nueva novela of the world-famous "boom" generation of Spanish American novelists.However, his influence extends beyond the heights achieved by the Spanish American novel in the sixties and seventies, and for this reason Marechal must be of more interest than ever.Ricardo Piglia, for example, one of the foremost writers in contemporary Argentina, includes Leopoldo Marechal among a pantheon of only three other literary forbears who, in his words, constitute "nuestra verdadera tradición" (Ficción y política 102).(The others are Macedonio Fernández, Roberto Arlt, and Jorge Luis Borges.)It is instructive that Piglia should choose Marechal as a precursor.Piglia's critical and theoretical sophistication, as well as his political orientation, should be enough to alert us to the possibility of a new reading of Marechal, one that breaks with the tradition that views Adán Buenosayres (1948) as a totalizing narrative endorsing Augustinian and Thomist metaphysics.One of Piglia's fictional characters, a renegade senator and oligarch, makes this observation about the official Argentine discourse grounded in authoritarian metaphysics: "se muestra ya la heterogeneidad de lo que nuestros enemigos siempre pensaron idéntico a sí mismo.Lo que podía pensarse unido, sólido, comienza a fragmentarse, a disolverse, erosionado por el agua de la historia" (Respiración artificial 61).The Piglia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.504 | 0.299 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".