Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ca/i/erXIXC'est un beau metier [4].Ca/7/erXIX opens with a draft manuscript in which Juno Fraser 2 is trying to circumvent doctor's orders to remain three weeks in bed to treat a case of jaundice.3 The doctor's French-language background, in contrast with the protagonist's English-Canadian background, is the springboard for several amusing comments about Canadians and their work ethics.The story is also an opportunity for observations about writing ("un beau metier," the doctor remarks [4]) and the writing process: 'Theories of genius had always annoyed her [Juno].[Genius] was the flowering of a particular seed-talent in a particular soil.This soil was fertile for the seed in certain circumstances" [13].Whether these circumstances existed in Canada remained a matter of some doubt for Engel.She viewed the Canadian literary scene as "pretty political now-I don't know what will happen to me if I admit to having always liked Irving Layton.4 Am I a feminist or a nationalist copout?" [24].Ca/7/erXIX also contains notes on the French writer Stephane Mallarme, who exalted the autonomous text "purified of origins and free to exist" without its author [19].Arguments and theories about textual independence were disseminated in France and Europe throughout the 1960s in critical movements such as structuralism.With her ability to read French, Engel encountered these ideas early in their evolution.Other entries in the notebook introduce the Heber family and return to small-town Ontario, both of which feature in Engel's 1978 novel, The Glassy Sea.Finally, the cahier contains two recipes, reproduced here, since writing and day-to-day living were not separate spheres for Engel. 1 1970, black notebook; 29 pages used. 2 Juno Fraser is one of several characters Engel presents who keep notebooks much like their author.3 During her year in the south of France (1960-61) Engel too had jaundice, as she recounts in a biographical sketch she includes in Cahier XXXIV. 4Layton's poetry was thought by some to express unacceptable and outdated sexist attitudes towards women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.389 | 0.195 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".