Bibliographic record
Abstract
If this is my Golden Notebook, I am getting into it a bit late [3 5].Of all her notebooks and papers, this is the only cahier Engel had embargoed, and then only for a period of five years (until 1988).To all intents and purposes, this was because of the extent and nature of her notes on psychotherapy sessions with John Rich.Some of these are reproduced here and depict Engel at grips with questions flowing from meetings with Rich, as well as questions about the process of psychotherapy itself.Engel examined her "objections to psychoanalysis-telling stories & paying-self-indulgence."She considered psychology to be "an incomplete worldview [...] specialises] can't understand some reality" [27]."As if novelists could!" she immediately quipped [27].Nevertheless, Engel viewed "making up [a]s more fun than sorting out.Don't want to look at things psychologically-superficial reality too important," she noted [27].Writing was always on Engel's mind, no matter how deeply her thoughts plunged into personal problems and relationships: "Should have written more," she scolded herself [28]."Should have written a lot more" [42].Engel's explorations involved references to the Lady of Shalott and Rapunzel; a sequence about being four feet tall; and a series of thoughts prompted by reading The Story of O. 2 about "the question of a lover," and clothing with which to attract or discourage one.These were not easy reflections for Engel, who struggled against feeling "guilty about confiding in anyone" [44].Buttressing the personal reflections of this cahier are two blocks of fiction.The first is an energetic piece entitled "Bicycle Story" in which forty-year-old Marjorie runs over her elderly mother Irene.Old age has not slowed down Irene and who continues to charge about town on her bicycle.She has darted 1974-75, "The embargoed notebook"; the inside cover lists train times to Toronto, and Alice Munro's phone number; 72 pages used.This is the the English tide of the translated (by Sabine Estree) version of L'Histoire d'O (1954) by Pauline Reage (pseudonym of Dominique Aury).In "The Unmasking of O," [The New Yorker (1 August 1994): 42-50] John St Jorre explores the intriguing story behind this book, its author and various individuals associated with it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.772 | 0.593 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".