Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNAIDS and the WHO released their annual report on HIV/AIDS, entitled AIDS Epidemic Update 2005, early last week.The findings of this report show promising progress in selected countries afflicted by AIDS.The most welcomed findings include a general decline in adult AIDS prevalence in pregnant women in Zimbabwe and Burkina Faso.The study suggested that these declines were in large part due to increased availability of treatment for the virus, and ameliorated sexual behavioural patterns, including increased condom use, fewer sexual partners, and the occurrence of a first sexual experience later in life.Increased accessibility to antiretroviral treatments for the virus is said to have saved upwards of 350 000 lives within the past year.However, despite the encouraging news, the AIDS epidemic continues to expand with 5 million new infections occurring within the last year.3 million deaths, including about 500 000 deaths in children, occurred during 2005.A relatively new geographical area at high risk is Central Asia, which experienced a 25% increase in cases over the calendar year.In order to strengthen the preventative measures being used by the WHO and UNAIDS, the report suggests the implementation of further educational programs, prevention of mother-to-child transmission during pregnancy, and programs fighting the spread of the virus through sex work and intravenous drug use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".