Effect of knee pain on muscles imbalance and physical limitation in individuals with bilateral knee osteoarthritis: A comparative cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: When osteoarthritis (OA) affects the knee, it causes muscle imbalance and physical limitations. This study aimed to determine the impact of knee pain on quadriceps strength, hamstring length, and physical limitations in individuals with bilateral knee OA. Methods: A cross-sectional study at Khyber Teaching Hospital and Northwest General Hospital, Peshawar, included individuals aged 50–65, who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Subjects diagnosed with bilateral knee OA (grade II or greater on the Kellgren–Lawrence grading scale) and experiencing pain in both knees (numeric pain rating scale [NPRS] score ≥ 1) were selected through purposive sampling ( n = 70). Data collection involved the NPRS, modified belt stabilizer hand-held dynamometer, active knee extension test, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Urdu version questionnaire. Measurements from both knees assessed quadriceps muscle strength, hamstring length, and physical limitations. Results: The median interquartile range (IQR) of quadricep strength for the more painful knee was 0.53 (0.36) Nm/kg and 1.35 (0.34) Nm/kg for the less painful knee showing a significant difference in quadriceps strength ( P < 0.01). In terms of hamstring length, the more painful knee had a median (IQR) of 29.0 (2.0) degrees whereas the less painful knee recorded 11.0 (6.0) degrees indicating a significant difference ( P < 0.01). Likewise, there was a significant difference in WOMAC scores between the less painful and more painful knees ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study found that individuals experiencing more knee pain demonstrated decreased quadriceps muscle strength and increased hamstring muscle tightness. In addition, those with more painful knees exhibited greater physical limitations in bilateral knee OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".