MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392115927 · doi:10.1017/9789048553754.010

“Wall Neighbors,” Mothers-in-Law, and Comadres: Spousal Violence and Networks of Plebeian Female Intimacy and Solidarity in Urban Neighborhoods of Early to Mid-Colonial New Spain (1550–1670)

2023· other· en· W4392115927 on OpenAlexaff
Jacqueline Holler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidarityColonialismSociologyGender studiesCriminologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: Studying practices of plebeian female solidarity in early colonial New Spain (1550–1670), this chapter argues that women's networks were central to contesting masculine violence in a context where neither ecclesiastical nor civil law could effectively combat it. Using petitions for ecclesiastical divorce and Inquisition records involving magic, the chapter further contends that masculine violence itself provided an impetus and a catalyst for the formation of female networks of affective solidarity, support, and the exchange of legal and magical information. Keywords: New Spain, Mexico City, violence against women, solidarity, female networks, plebeians, magic, divorce In 1614, Mariana de Salas described to Inquisitors of Mexico City's Holy Office how her neighbors attempted to help her combat her husband's abuse with magical remedies using variously a lizard, herbs, black powders, and worms. Testifying in 1649 to episcopal authorities in the same city, Madelena de Abrego detailed confronting her neighbor about his abuse of his wife and being mockingly asked whether Madalena thought she was his mother-in-law. The stories of these and other plebeian women emerge from the records of early modern religious courts: primarily, petitions for “ecclesiastical divorce” (marital separation), and secondarily, denunciations for witchcraft and superstition submitted to the Inquisition. These records demonstrate that in confronting spousal abuse, the women of the towns of early colonial New Spain (1530–1650) built and mobilized local peer networks to access protection and solidarity that institutions did not effectively supply. In turn, as women responded to the particular dangers of spousal violence, their affective bonds were reinforced. Examining the synergistic relationship between women's networks and their contestation of spousal violence gives us insight into an important dimension of gendered sociability and affect in the early modern world, where spousal violence could be constitutive of women's affective bonds. Gossiping about, challenging, and coping with the violence of male partners brought women together in intimate relationships that both deepened recognized bonds (such as those between mothers and daughters) and forged new ones. Both the affective and the protective benefits of these networks of female solidarity were likely more accessible to town women than to their rural counterparts because of the spatial proximity characteristic of urban neighborhoods; this chapter therefore confines itself to town women. This chapter relies upon two bodies of documentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207